<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
			
			<rss version="2.0">
			<channel>
			<title>Alte Z&#xfc;rcher Blog - Digital</title>
			<link>http://blog.forthmedia.com/index.cfm</link>
			<description>blog Blog</description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:50:16-0400</pubDate>
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:18:00-0400</lastBuildDate>
			<generator>BlogCFC</generator>
			<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
			<managingEditor>r.tugwell@forthmedia.com</managingEditor>
			<webMaster>r.tugwell@forthmedia.com</webMaster>
			
			
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>EOS 5D vs. M3 - Smackdown!</title>
				<link>http://blog.forthmedia.com/index.cfm/2007/2/22/EOS-5D-vs-M3--Smackdown</link>
				<description>
				
				&lt;p&gt;Ok - we&apos;re going to put these two heavyweights in the ring and see who ends up on the bottom. We&apos;ll answer the questions they don&apos;t even dare ask on Dpreview. So, which of these cameras takes the best snaps?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually more to the point, which of these two buggers is heavier? Don&apos;t have my scales with me but it would not surpise me if it was the Leica, given that it&apos;s fashioned from a solid block of Thousand Year Reich steel, finished with brass counterweights. (woops sorry, the war finished 15 years before my Leica was made, but what the hell).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a serious note the question is completely irrelevant of course. Here&apos;s my take on the digital vs. analogue debate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Image quailty doesn&apos;t really figure in this if all you&apos;re interested in is sharp photos. For most photographic purposes the quality produced by 40 year old Leica glass, film, etc and 21st century computer/cameras is more than adequate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Image character is different - I&apos;m not going to get into the Leica-look debate, but there is something in it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) If you&apos;re taking photos at a football match, maybe leave the Leica at home&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) If you&apos;re taking candid shots in a quiet cafe, the Canon will make you look like someone with more camera than common sense, and might well arouse comments such as &amp;quot;don&apos;t point that fucking thing at me - asshole&amp;quot;. With the M3 you are more likely to get &amp;quot;hey, is that a, you know, camera?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shucks - I&apos;ve made my point - horses for courses. Of course I didn&apos;t talk about workflow.... maybe next time&lt;/p&gt;
				
				</description>
						
				
				<category>Canon</category>				
				
				<category>leica</category>				
				
				<category>Digital</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:18:00-0400</pubDate>
				<guid>http://blog.forthmedia.com/index.cfm/2007/2/22/EOS-5D-vs-M3--Smackdown</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Canon EOS 5D - first impressions</title>
				<link>http://blog.forthmedia.com/index.cfm/2007/1/16/Canon-EOS-5D--first-impressions</link>
				<description>
				
				&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ve had a Canon EOS 5D for a couple of months now, and so far I&apos;m pretty happy with it, although maybe I regret not buying a Leica M8 (despite the bugs). I bought it as an upgrade to my EOS 20D. Why upgrade? Why Canon? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The answer to the first is that I wanted a 12-13mp sensor.
				 [More]
				</description>
						
				
				<category>Canon</category>				
				
				<category>Digital</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:43:00-0400</pubDate>
				<guid>http://blog.forthmedia.com/index.cfm/2007/1/16/Canon-EOS-5D--first-impressions</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			</channel></rss>