Photographing food - solving DOF problems

Ok - this food photography business has really started irritating me. Why? Well I can't seem to get it right, and my efforts still look crap compared with even the cheapest book illustrations. I've got the bit between my teeth now though. I don't plan on becoming a food photographer, but as someone who takes his photography fairly seriously, I reckon I ought to be able to do better.

There are two clear aspects to this. One is the technical photographic side, which brings it's own unique challenges. The other is the presentation of the actual food itself. In this post I'm going to concentrate on the former

In the last post on this subject I was muttering about DOF problems. Now I should do a lot more experimentation, finding out the limits of DOF with various lenses and aperture settings, But the next thing I did was just to stop down the next shot to f8, that should be enough, normally gets me from 15 feet to the andromeda galaxy with my Summicron 50mm. However closeups are different.

salmon and spaghetti

Now I know you're thinking "this guy only eats steamed fish and spinach - must be real fit and healthy", If that was all I ate - yes. So this was quickly shot and eaten - f8 as I said before. Well the bad news is that there's only about the width of of a slice of prosciutto in focus

Now I was getting annoyed, so I did a bit of research. DOF in this situation is not ever going to be enough, not with ordinary equipment. So, how do people do it. Well the professionals probably use a view camera with tilt/shift capabilities. I don't think I'm going down that route. I had a look at tilt/shift lenses for Canon, but I don't think I can justify those just to satisfy my curiosity, However I found another solution, or compromise.

There are some software programs out there that will take a series of photographs taken at different focus distances, and stitch them together into one über photo with unlimited DOF. A bit like HDR techniques for exposure. I had a look at one "HeliconFocus" and it really does work. (heliconfilter.com/pages/)

Here is an ordinary photograph, taken at f8

aberdeen angus fillet steak

And here is one after the HeliconFocus processing. This consists of taking multiple images focussing gradually from the front to the back of the subject in small increments.

aberdeen angus fillet steak with heliconfocus

It's maybe difficult to see the extent of the difference from these small images, but it definitely works and doesn't seem to lose any image quality. Here are some crops which show how the DOF is improved in more detail. The first image was focused pretty much on the front of the subject

Now the composite image - sorry about the difference in colour and contrast


I didn't take a lot of care over it, just 6 different focus points and it looks as though I missed the front focus point altogether, but I think the improvement is quite clear. Probably would take a lot more "slices" if I was doing it seriously. This piece of software is well worth a look at if you need to solve this kind of problem. Looks as though it was developed for technical applications like microscopy, but works for these product type shots.

So I'm going to persevere now - next time I'm going to start concentrating on the actual subject matter. For that reason probably best not to use something I'm going to immediately eat

BreezeBrowser - XML templates

With the advent of digital photography many new types of application sprang up to support workflow. Probably the most prevalent was the Image Browser - in my view an invaluable tool.  This allows you to quickly view, sort, discard you images and probably perform some other digital management tasks as well. For me it is the first step in the workflow. It's your light table. Most camera vendors provided very poor support in this area, and it has been left to third parties to define the market. Some heavyweight applications such as Photoshop have tried to incorporate the feature, but PS Filebrowser, and later Bridge have been laughable in my opinion. Adobe Lightroom may change this - wait and see.

For my part I have used a product called BreezeBrowser for a few years now. I'm not going to enter into a comparison of products here. Suffice to say that BB does exactly what I want at this point in the worklflow. It is very fast at producing previews, seems to be able to read any new RAW format effortlessly, and has good support for IPTC editing. It also has an excellent Raw converter.

BB also has a customisable interface for producing HTML galleries. This is not unusual - many photo applications do this, but BB makes it very easy and imposes no constraints. I decided to leverage this function and rather than producing ready made HTML pages, I could see the use for generating the information in XML format where it could be reused as part of dynamically generated applications, for online galleries or repurposing as PDF for example.

You can download the templates I created for this (GNU/GPL license). You will need to know a bit about Breezebrowser, XML and some kind of programming technology to make the most of them

Download XML templates

Also check out the Breezebrowser home page

Implementation by Forthmedia Based on BlogCFC by Raymond Camden.